Even After Health Care Reform, Insurance Companies Don’t Have to Cover Infertility

A while back I asked if infertility treatments would be covered under the new health care reform bill. We now have an answer, and it’s a not good one if you’re infertile. According to Susan Donaldson James at ABC News, there is nothing in the new health reform care bill that mandates insurance companies cover infertility. Nothing in the new law says that insurance companies have to cover the cost of IVF, egg donation, IUI, ICSI or any other infertility treatment. That’s the bad news.

Map of the US statesThe good news is that 13 states do mandate some form of coverage of infertility related medical problems. However, each state’s insurance laws are different. Maryland mandates that insurers cover up to three IVF cycles. New Jersey covers only women under 46 years old. Hawaii covers only one IVF cycle. In Arkansas, insurance payments for infertility are capped at $15,000. Massachusetts seems to be the most generous–there are no limits on the number of IVF treatment cycles. But even there, large companies with self-insured plans and small employers are exempt from the mandate.

The new federal health insurance reform bill does prohibit health insurance companies for denying you an insurance plan based on pre-existing conditions. If you suffer from polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, or uterine fibroids your chosen insurer still has to accept you. That’s the way it should be.

But outside the 13 states with some form of mandated infertility coverage, the decision to cover infertility treatments is up to your insurance company and your employer. Depending on the decisions your insurance company and employer make, the cost of infertility treatments could be an out-of-pocket expense or could be covered. 80 percent of Americans are not covered for infertility.

This story breaks my heart:

“Josie’s story in startling,” said Barbara Collura, executive director of RESOLVE, who has heard increasing complaints from couples worry about the financial burden of fertility treatments.

Josie, a 42-year-old from Virginia Beach, Va., and her husband have visited several clinics to inquire about IVF. Some charge as much as $17,000 for just one try.

“In vitro is our only option but we cannot afford this and our insurance doesn’t cover it,” said Josie, who didn’t want to share her last name.

“We also have tried to purchase health insurance on our own but couldn’t find one to cover fertility,” she said. “Financing such a dream is impossible as both my husband and I don’t have the best credit. Our dream is fading.”

What’s your perspective? Should we institute some form of mandated insurance coverage of infertility federally? Does your health insurance cover infertility treatments?

GD Star Rating
loading...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Tags: ,

One Response to “Even After Health Care Reform, Insurance Companies Don’t Have to Cover Infertility”

  1. Corey December 22, 2010 at 4:55 am #

    Our government really missed the boat on this one. It is making it’s people purchase/obtain thru their employer health insurance, and said insurance companies don’t have to treat the very real diagnosis of infertility. There is something wrong with our country and its “law makers”. If they are going to pass and enforce the rule that every citizien should by law carry health insurance. Then they should cover EVERY illness/condtion/and treating therapy known to mankind.

    When my then live in BF and I had realized that we where never going to have an “accident”. I wondered could something be wrong? We just peeked at the idea of a fertility clinic back then. We married two years ago and my then treating gyn was like wow now we can have some babies! His smile turned to sobs I sware when I handed him the company issued BCBSGA card. I said what’s wrong doc? and he said matter of factly these people don’t like to pay. And that was just for routine female care, nevermind anything “fancy” like IUI or the holy grail IVF. At the last contract meeting for my spouses company they where elated to announce they had “added care for infertility” This is what their care consisted of ” Consult and Diagnosis only”. So basically my husband is wasting almost $4K in health insurance that won’t even treat our most pressing issue. I have 1/2 a mind to tell my husband when enrollment comes around I think we should dump it for two years and pocket the money we would have paid out for health care and put it towards saving for our baby making plans. But alas we live in a healthcare mandated state(Massholes anyone?). So I don’t know if we will ever save up enough cash for the IVF the doctor says we need. We went to the fancy clinic meet a wonerful staff had our work up done and it was concluded that with our limmited funds we would get good results with IVF. I’m 29 and my husband is “older “May/dec my grandmother called it. I figure how things are going and with our luck we’d best save for atleast 3 rounds of IVF and by then my hubby will be 54 and I’ll be 34…cripes watch the doctor tell us where to old.
    Infertility stinks.

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge